Get Protected - Blog
5 Common Mistakes in Workplace Investigation Process

Friday, 24 April 2015

5 Common Mistakes in Workplace Investigation Process

 From a post  by Catherine Gillespie on hrdaily community: 

Workplace investigations require a thorough, unbiased and procedurally fair approach. There are common mistakes made during all phases of the investigation process that can put the integrity of the investigation at risk.

  #1 – Not being responsive Taking too long to respond to a complaint can lead to a bigger issue developing and the risk of legal intervention. An employer has a duty of care to act promptly and to keep the investigation moving at an adequate pace without any major delays

. #2 – Unclear reporting processes Lack of company policies and procedures or inadequate communication/training around company policies and procedures can leave an employee with little knowledge about what to do in the case of an incident/complaint. Employees need to know the process for making a complaint and investigators should follow the company’s policy on the handling of these complaints. 

#3 – Biased investigator It is essential to choose individuals who have no relationship, interest or perceived bias to conduct the investigation.  Sometimes the HR department may contain individuals that fit this description, otherwise an independent investigator is a more appropriate option. 

#4 – Poor interviewing Experienced investigators hold the key to conducting detailed, useful interviews that explore the allegations in a manner that:

  • refrains from leading an interviewee to give a predetermined answer;
  • maintains the topic of the interview without allowing the interviewee to wander into irrelevant information; and
  • refrains from using affirming language in the interview which can be perceived as bias.
#5 – Skipping the final phase Post the investigation, an employer needs to provide feedback by way of meeting separately with each complainant and respondent to advise them of the findings of the investigation. Only parties for whom outcomes apply (such as disciplinary action, termination of employment etc.) should be advised of this type of information.

Learn about Barringtons Investigations services here

Blayne Webb, Director, Barringtons

SuperUser Account

SuperUser Account

Other posts by SuperUser Account

Please login or register to post comments.


The latest blogs

Tharwal Aboriginal Corporation Aboriginal Medical Service Celebrate 100% Completion

18 Graduates from Barringtons Certificate IV in Leadership and Management

Viktoria 0 1752 Article rating: No rating
ACAMS (Tharwal Aboriginal Corporation Aboriginal Medical Service) is located in the suburb of Airds in the Macarthur region of south western Sydney. Their mission is to move forward to provide a quality service that combines traditional values with commitment to enhance health and wellbeing for Aboriginal communities of the Sydney South Western region.

Liquor & Gaming NSW Decisions - 15

Commerical Hotel Motel Lithgow

Viktoria 0 1176 Article rating: No rating
From 1 March 2015, Liquor & Gaming NSW (L&GNSW) is required by Part 5 of the Gaming and Liquor Administration Act 2007 to publish on its website notices of certain decisions by the Secretary of the Department of Justice (the Secretary) or the respective L&GNSW delegate.